bikeslooki.blogg.se - Kite compositor javascript

#Kite compositor javascript drivers#
#Kite compositor javascript code#
#Kite compositor javascript mac#

The timeline is pretty heavy, can be complicated to learn unless you’re experienced with After Effects.Almost everything you can imagine can be animated using web-standards, so reliance on this 3rd party library is questionable.HaikuCore – handles everything for you.Publishes encapsulated components that can be rendered across a multitude of web and mobile platforms.

You can use expressions to add dynamic behaviour to components – this is pretty badass.

Supports Sketch, Figma, Adobe Illustrator and SVG files.

Publishing, sharing and embedding your interactive animations is easy.

Powerful timeline: sequence and animate elements using the built-in tween and easing curve library.

For example, if you want to create a custom shape or edit its curves you’ll have to do these in Sketch and import them into Flow.

Reliance on Sketch: advanced editing tools for paths and typography are missing from the product.

Young product: learning and support resources are available, but the team needs to focus on producing more.

#Kite compositor javascript drivers#

You can experiment with drivers after exporting code, you just can’t do it from within Flow itself. Interaction is a few steps away: it currently isn’t a prototyping tool where you can lay out a screen and animate the “flow” of a user’s experience.

#Kite compositor javascript mac#

Mac only: but since they’re targeting Sketch users as a primary audience this isn’t totally bad.

Copy / Paste from anywhere: Despite only being able to import Sketch files, you can copy and paste content into a Flow document from almost any other application.

progress updates) to drive your animations. That means you can use gestures, triggers, or dynamic input (e.g.

#Kite compositor javascript code#

Drivers: The latest release generates drivers as part of its code export.Simplified interface: If you’ve ever edited a keyframe in your life then Flow’s interface will make sense to you.Also, code is not dependent on the integration of any 3rd-party software. Powerful code: Flow’s code export system consistently exports the most modern syntax for iOS and web development and exports light-weight, industry-standard code for either platform.You can accurately edit timing, change easing curves, and even copy/paste values and animations between layers. Powerful timeline: with its design-focused approach, editing anything on the stage creates timelines for any properties that change.Lottie is a beast of a codebase, and (for iOS at least) it is written in Objective-C… Where’s the Swift?ĭribble Logo animation done with Flow.Questionable continued development of Lottie and Bodymovin, and a setup / pipeline that would make Rube Goldberg proud.After Effects is bloated and requires a fast machine to run it fast enough to work super efficiently.

No special integration for Sketch files – though there is a 3rd party plugin Sketch2AE… but it’s website literally says “fully broken in Sketch 52!”.

After Effects is not geared for UI animation.

If you are new to it, After Effects can be a lot to take in.Animations can be driven by gestures using the animated progress feature.Optional caching mechanism for frequently used animation.Supports loading JSON files over the network, which is useful for A/B testing.Lottie’s library allows for a variety of different kinds of animations, including basic line art, character-based animations, and dynamic logo animations with multiple angles and cuts.After Effects is incredibly powerful and there are countless of resources out there to help you learn it.Our CriteriaĪ wide variety of animations created with After Effects and Lottie. This is swiftly changing with a range of new tools that allow designers to animate their work and export it directly to code. To be fair, unless you possess a very broad set of design / animation / programming skills - you probably haven’t had much opportuinity to truly contribute to the production process. It’s wasteful, frustrating and inefficient.ĭesigners and animators should be producing, * as well as* prototyping. Designers and animators hand-off these carefully crafted prototypes and developers are left to wrestle with recreating it all in code. all, have their place but the problem is, they don’t directly contribute to production. Prototyping tools like Invision, Marvel, Figma, et. So does being able to directly contribute to production. But as you get further along with a project, being able to craft the fine details of your work becomes critical. If that’s the case, then any tool that empowers you to quickly ground the concept is ideal. At an early stage, you’re probably experimenting with high-level concepts like the the general flow, look, feel and style of an app or site. There is quite a big difference, and the answer often lies in the current stage of a project. The first thing you need to ask yourself is if you want to be “producing” or “prototyping”.